Efficacy of epidural analgesia in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery

Masahiro Wakasugi*, Kiyoshi Shakunaga, Junko Fujimura, Koji Jomura, Akira Masuda, Yusuke Ito

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery (MIDCAB), coronary bypass grafting with small thoracotomy using no cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), became popular recently. To attenuate perioperative stress- response, we used epidural analgesia (EPI) with general anesthesia for MIDCAB operation. In this study, we compared retrospectively 11 cases of MIDCAB managed with EPI (ED (+)), and 14 cases of MIDCAB anesthetized without using EPI (ED (-)), concerning extubation time, ICU stay, hospital stay and perioperative complications. The mean time from cessation of general anesthesia to extubation was significantly shorter in ED (+) patients (0.5 hours) when compared to ED (-) patients (18.2 hours). Mean periods of ICU stay and hospital stay were, also, shorter in ED (+) patients (2.1 days, 30.5 days, respectivery) when compared to ED (-) (4.3 days, 45.1 days, respectively) patients. We experienced ventricular tachycardia in three patients of ED (-). No major complication occurred in ED (+) patients. These results suggest that EPI shortened extubation time, ICU and hospital stay for MIDCAB patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1207-1211
Number of pages5
JournalJapanese Journal of Anesthesiology
Volume47
Issue number10
StatePublished - 1998/10

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of epidural analgesia in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this